Hong Kong has a chance to shape AI based on its own values

These models exhibit an inventive creativity in shaping AI to reflect the needs and priorities of their populations, rather than passively adopting an off-the-shelf technical tool. They offer examples of how AI can be localised in aspects ranging from language and terminology to underlying value systems and problem-solving methodologies.

Market-driven technological change is a double-edged sword. Our way of life is not at immediate risk from AI’s rise. As sceptics like Robert Gordon point out, even if “the [automated] car drives up to my house, how does the package get from the car to my porch? Who carries it when I’m away?”

AI is still in its infancy; as of now, it has only expanded the realm of what computers can do. But the most profound economic impact and productivity gains from its maturation and widespread adoption still lie ahead.

A collaborative approach can guide AI’s assimilation and localisation to where it is most needed. For instance, Hong Kong’s transport sector could be transformed through AI optimisation of traffic flows, predictive maintenance for public transit and dynamic pricing systems to reduce congestion.

Applying AI chatbots and virtual assistants to streamline government services like licence applications and immigration processing could vastly improve convenience and accessibility.

In healthcare, AI could help to improve care delivery and enhance overall access. Precision medicine powered by AI can provide targeted therapies and early interventions. Telemedicine relieves overloaded facilities while virtual nursing assistants mitigate the shortage of physical nurses.

AI diagnostic tools can expand access to quality healthcare and shorten waiting times. By focusing on improving access, equity and